Construction contracts and rules hold back u.s. economy – bloomberg cnn nutrition apple cider vinegar

Fortunately, things may not be quite that bad. Measuring productivity growth in any industry is difficult. Costs have to be calculated correctly — for example, some calculations leave subcontractors out of the equation. And different pieces of the industry — for example, single-family home construction versus infrastructure construction — can behave very differently. The business cycle can distort the picture, too. In 2014, a team of economists from the bureau of labor statistics found decreasing productivity in the industry, but the same team updated the analysis four years later and found an increase.

But everyone seems to agree that construction productivity hasn’t kept pace with other industries. This is having a big effect on living standards in the U.S. With road repair prohibitively expensive, whole towns can potentially wither and die as they get cut off from the rest of the economy.Construction costs

expensive and inefficient trains make it harder for american cities to function, leaving poor people stranded at the edges of town. A shortage of new housing can drive up rents, especially in big cities, squeezing the poor and middle class and preventing cities from achieving their full productive potential. It can also reduce the quality of the housing stock, because buildings are too expensive to renovate. Housing is one of the most basic and important things that americans consume — much more important than the latest iphone or fancy new chat app.

Improving construction productivity would therefore make life better for all 323 million americans and their descendants. The challenge, then, is to find out what’s holding the industry back. One thing that doesn’t seem to be the problem is excessive salaries for construction workers; pay in the industry is actually very modest:

There is, however, the question of overstaffing.Construction costs even if one construction worker is paid a low salary, hiring 10 workers to do a job that two could manage just as safely and easily would cause massive overruns. A recent investigative report in the new york times found anecdotal evidence of enormous overstaffing in that city’s subway-construction projects, especially when compared with countries such as france. Infrastructure blogger alon levy says overstaffing is widespread, and pins the blame on union contracts, which are prevalent in government contracting.

Overstaffing means that the need to reduce construction costs directly conflicts with the need to provide more jobs to working-class americans. That puts policy makers in quite a bind.

Fortunately, before tackling the thorny issue of overstaffing, there are lots of other things that can be done to reduce construction costs. One important task is for governments to smooth out construction spending — instead of building only in boom times, cities and states should have a consistent flow of construction.Reduce construction costs that also reduces wear and tear on existing infrastructure, saving money down the road.

A second is to prevent regulatory interruption of construction work. In san francisco, for example, repeated regulatory appeals routinely stop or delay construction work for long periods of time, creating risk, idling workers, and driving up costs. Streamlining permitting and approval processes and harmonizing building codes would also remove much of the regulatory burden without negatively affecting workers. A report by mckinsey & co. Also suggests moving to a long-term, collaborative type of contracting called integrated project delivery.

In other words, there are lots of ways to reduce construction costs without addressing the difficult tradeoff between jobs and efficiency. In its quest to lower expenses, the U.S. Should first pick the low-hanging fruit of regulatory and contracting reform.